News Update- 5-17-23 – How was the Fatima Rosary Prayer so mistranslated?

Portuguese Language Friends of Sister Lucy Truth have uncovered the research that discovered the
correct and original text of the “Oh my Jesus” prayer, that was meant to be placed at the end of each
decade of the rosary.

We begin our Guest Writers Page with a Post from Arkadiusz Niewolski on the Profound Impact that the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation has had and MUST HAVE on Poland.

The Lifesite interview with Dr. Chojnowski and John-Henry Westen is HERE

NEWS ITEM – There was only ONE Imposter Sister Lucy from her first appearance in 1967 to her death in 2005. Read the Report from Lois Gibson, a Guinness Book of World Records Forensic Artist. Here is OUR evidence, even though we have a lot more. Where is the scientific evidence from those who say there were a number of fake Sister Lucys?

Lois Gibson’s report here

Did Our Lady Predict, in 1920, the Constant Persecution and Final Demise of Sister Lucy of Fatima? It appears so. See article HERE

Dr. Chojnowski: Here is a basic chronological description of the life of Lucy dos Santos up until her sudden disappearance sometimes between 1957 and 1967. I would like to put special emphasis — as I did with my bolding of the text and capitalization — on the Prophecy that Our Lady made to Jacinta immediately before her death concerning her cousin Lucy. For all of the below, we follow the account given in the excellent text by Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight (Niagara Falls, Ontario: Marmion Publications, 2003).

The “Official” Image: A Perfect Representation of Deception: The Fraud was Intentional and Professional From the Beginning. All with “Ecclesiastical Authority”!

The “Official” Image: A Devious Gift That Keeps Giving

Sister Lucy Truth exclusively broke the reality that one of the most widely circulated, “officially” approved photographs of “Sister Lucy” and Paul VI in 1967 is, in fact, a fraud. This “Official” image is below:

INSERT: 1 – Official Image Lucia and Paul VI

 

We proved that this “Official” image could be traced all the way back to a June 13, 1967 publication of Voz De Fatima, the official mouthpiece of the Shrine of Fatima, thus refuting any argument that the image emanated from some “unofficial” source years later.

However, it is important to now focus in on precisely the level of deception at work with this Official image. Indeed, as we will prove below, this is not the case where a picture of “Lucia” was innocently cut out and placed next to Paul VI in collage fashion. No, it wasn’t that simple. The level of intent is far more calculating. As conclusively demonstrated below, the source image of the “Lucia” depicted in the “Official” photo was itself manipulated. Specifically, the eyes and a portion of the face were altered to fit the narrative. We will explain. First, it is critical to realize that what we will call the “Source” image used for the “Lucia” portion of the “Official” photo is the image below:

INSERT: 2 – Source Image Lucia Young- 1967

 

The problem with this photograph, however, is that the woman’s body is facing the wrong direction relative to the position necessary to render a believable Official image. Indeed, her body is facing left even though her eyes are looking right. To be used in the Official image, the woman in this Source photo would need to appear as though both her eyes and body were pointed out toward the cheering crowds at Fatima next to Paul VI. Simple fix, just flip the image, right? Wrong.

INSERT: 3 – Source Image Lucia Young Reversed

When the image is flipped (for a mirror image), the woman’s body now faces the “correct” direction—perfectly consistent with the “Official” image—but, problematically, the woman’s eyes now gaze the “wrong” way. How can this be corrected?

The only option is to manipulate the eyes so they too face the correct direction. Precisely how these eyes were manipulated—or even whose eye(s) were used—for the Official image is unknown. Could one of the eyes actually be from the real Lucia? What is known is that the position of the eyes on the Official image is impossible because they gaze in the same direction as the body faces when we know that in the Source image the body faces one direction and the eyes look in the opposite direction.  In analyzing how the eyes were specifically manipulated, two interesting items have emerged.

FIRST ANOMALY: The “Miracle” of the Eyebrow

In the Official image, “Sister Lucia’s” left eyebrow is unnaturally floating off of her face. This physical “miracle” will undoubtedly be cited in her forthcoming canonization along with her amazing ability to bi-locate (tri-locate?) as documented elsewhere on this site. This anomaly is difficult to detect with the naked eye on the Official image but it is apparent upon close forensic image analysis. Below are several important images: (i) a close up of the Official image, (ii) a close up of the face with the colors inverted (ala a negative image), and (iii) a magnified view of the face using publicly available forensic photo software. Anyone reading this article can download the Official image and view these anomalies for themselves:

The floating eyebrow is apparent even to the naked eye upon close inspection.

INSERT: 4 – Close Up Official Lucia Eyebrow

 

If the Official image is posted into a free photo editing software such as paint.net and Control+Shift+I is pressed, the following image emerges.

INSERT: 5 – Official Image Lucia Young_Inverted Color

Below is the face of “Lucia” from the Official image magnified using free forensic software, Forensically.

INSERT: 6 – Official Image Lucia Magnified

 

SECOND ANOMALY: Deliberately Aged Face and Protruding Eyelid

It is evident the Source image was intentionally manipulated to make the individual appear older. This can be most clearly observed by comparing the right eye of the Source image with the right eye of the Lucia depicted on the cover of a book published in 1975, Lucie Raconte Fatima. A comparison reveals that the image was added to or otherwise altered below her right eye because (a) there is a clear, unmistakable, unnatural protrusion of the lower right eyelid up into the eye, and (b) the crease below the right eye in the Official image with Paul VI and the Lucie Raconte Fatima image is nonexistent in the Source photo.  It is unclear whether the unnatural protrusion of the lower lid is evident in the “Official” image, but the eyes of that image had to undergo further manipulation to obtain the “correct” position as mentioned, above.

Lucie Raconte Fatima, 1975

INSERT: 7 – Lucie Raconte Fatima cover

Again, here is the Source image.

INSERT: 8 – Source Image Lucia close up

Close up of the Lucie Raconte Fatima cover photo

INSERT: 9 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_1

Below is another image of the Lucie Raconte Fatima book cover with a different resolution

INSERT: 10 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_2

Anomalies to the crease and lower eyelid clearly evident.

INSERT: 11 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_3

 

 Conclusion. The Official image is more than a cut and paste job. It represents specific, intentional manipulation to present the perfect image to fit a convenient narrative. Indeed, one official publication with “Ecclesiastical Approval”— Documents on Fatima & the Memoirs of Sister Lucia, pg. 79—ironically captioned the Official image with a curious quote from Bishop John Venancio (pictured to Paul VI’s right on the Official image). Venancio commented on the meaning of the Official image as follows: “This gesture of the Pope indicated, ‘What Sister Lucia stands for, I stand behind.’”

Since we know with certainty that the “Lucia” in the Official image was a carefully manipulated fraud, it appears Bishop Venancio’s words were truer than anyone realized: what Paul VI actually stood behind was an intentional deception.

anúncio -12/30/22-denunciantes portugueses procurados
por favor me ajude Irmã Lúcia dos Santos

entre em contato com sisterlucytruth.org/contact
entre em contato com justicepc@yahoo.com

Montini and the Mimic – From SLT FILMS

This film has English dialog – HERE

To watch with Portuguese subtitles for our friends in Portugal, Brazil and around the world go HERE

News Item – World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of “Sister Lucy” from after 1957 were Forgeries. Analysis of “Third Secret” Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy’s Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/handwriting-analysis/

New and Revised Analysis Comparing Known and Excepted Handwriting Samples form Sister Lucy to the Letter Written in November of 1969, in which complete obedience to Paul VI’s revolutionary actions in the Church is urged. Analyst certifies that the “Third Secret” (written in 1944) released by the Vatican IS consistent with the known Sister Lucy’s handwritings, leaving open the possibility of a “Fourth Secret.”

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf

Sworn testimony and analysis of “Manuscript of Sister Lucy” which served as the basis, put forward as authentic by the Carmelites of Coimbra, for Sister Lucy’s official biography. This cleverly done forgery was published by the Blue Army.

                                 Scroll Down to Report #2

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf

Signatures of Sister Lucy from the 1940s compared to those of documents in 1967 and 1969. Clever forgeries indicating that the Real Sister Lucy was gone from the scene by these years.

Scroll Down To Report #3

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf

Current and completed Facial Recognition Reports, Forensic Artist’s Report, Plastic Surgeon’s Report, Handwriting Analysts report, and Orthodontist Report can Be located at:

sisterlucyimposter.org

Contributions to the Sister Lucy Truth fund for further research and investigations, can be made at:

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/donate/

Interview with Fr. Paul Kramer – Besides the proven forgeries, Fr. Paul Kramer stated that when he met and spoke with real sister Lucia’s older sister Carolina, she said that her sister never used a typewriter or computer but always wrote in longhand. – Listen HERE

Fr. Paul Kramer- “She told me another interesting fact. She said that whenever she would visit her sister Lucia, she was not allowed to speak with her privately.”
“She would sit with the other sisters at a distance so she couldn’t see close up who was this person.“

Does Sister Lucy Truth have any Idea where the Imposter Sister Lucy is from? From the Reports of three Linguistic Analysts, the Imposter’s accent places her someplace in or near Viseu, Portugal, 100 miles north of Fatima.

If there are any Producers/Directors interested in this project please contact Dr. Peter Chojnowski at: justicepc@yahoo.com

Click image below to view the trailer.

News Item – According to this forensic math/facial recognition report prepared by Dr. Robert J. Bennett the chances of Lucy I being Lucy II are one in 13 million!

See video – HERE    Forensic Math Report – HERE

(Robert J. Bennett, Ph.D., holds a doctorate in General Relativity from Stevens Institute of Technology. He served as a physics instructor at Manhattan College and Bergen Community College from 1967-1983, and is presently doing private tutoring in physics and mathematics. He has served as a consultant for the entire Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right project.)

News Item – Another Priest from the U.S. and two Nuns from Fatima acknowledge the Imposter Lucy – Here

Here is a complete video presentation of our first, and so far only, in-person presentation of the results of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation that began in 2017 and continues to this very day. After listening to this and viewing all of our so-far-published information at sisterlucytruth.org, please tell us if we have not at least shown you that there is need for an investigation into the case of Sister Lucy dos Santos, the famous Seer of Fatima.

As was even clear 3 years ago, but has become clearer over the past months, when we are dealing with the case of Sister Lucy dos Santos, the actual seer of Fatima, who predicted and witnessed the Miracle of the Sun on October 13, 1917, we find that we are clearly and undeniably dealing with a case of stolen identity that could be the result of murder, kidnapping, or illicit confinement. The overwhelming evidence backing up that assertion, plus the total lack of real scientific evidence that would argue the contrary, has been presented by Sister Lucy Truth in the public forum, accessible on-line at sisterlucytruth.org.

Based upon the findings present in these reports we have found that there was an imposter substituted for the real Sister Lucy of Fatima at least by the date of May 13, 1967 when the Imposter appeared along side Paul VI when the latter was making an obligatory trip to Fatima to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the first apparition. The woman that appeared on that day has been scientifically identified as the same woman that appeared as “Sister Lucy” in 1982 when John Paul II, after the assassination attempt against him on May 13, 1981, “visited” “Sister Lucy” in his attempt to associate his recovery with the Fatima Apparitions and, seemingly, to prepare the ground for the claim that the Third Secret, given in 1917 was actually about the assassination attempt against him in 1981, even though, according to Sister Lucy, the Secret was supposed to be released by 1960 because by that year, the content of the Secret would be “clearer.” In light of the scientific findings in this case, we at Sister Lucy Truth assert that this first visit to the Imposter in 1982 was the first stage of an attempt to hijack the Third Secret for John Paul II’s own Neo-Modernist ends. Suddenly, by 2000 HE WAS THE HERO AND MEANING OF THE THIRD SECRET. We are convinced that this could only have happened if there was an imposter which long before had taken the place of Sister Lucy of Fatima.

Now Sister Lucy Truth moves its investigation on to answering the questions, why it was done, how it was done, when it was done, who did it, and who was the substitute put in the place of the real Sister Lucy of Fatima. We will also seek the DNA proof that will render our case irrefutable. -Dr. Peter Chojnowski
Please support us by donating at sisterlucytruth.org/donate

Those who dismiss the forensic reports, (over a dozen), usually come back with this objection. VIDEO – HERE

Objection #10. Wouldn’t Sr. Lucy’s family or relatives or the nuns of her convent have known that she was an imposter?
Firstly, we don’t know what Sr. Lucy’s family, relatives, or nuns “knew” about her, and barring the revelation of some unknown confession, we may never know. However, there are some truths we do know. The scientific and medical evidence we have is irrefutable. All the logistical difficulties of how an imposter could be introduced are secondary details that remain to be discovered. However, we know that the relatives were never allowed to see Sr. Lucy face-to-face but always behind the grille and in the presence of other sisters of the community. Hence there was no opportunity for intimate or in-depth conversation.

If it is true that the Church replaced Sr. Lucy with an imposter, if it is possible that the Church was overrun by Communists and Freemasons, is it not also reasonable to believe that these thugs acting in the name of the Church exerted pressure on Sr. Lucy’s relatives to remain silent and pretend as if nothing were happening? This isn’t proof that there was an imposter. It is simply stating that we should not be surprised that a cover up would involve tying up the loose ends with whatever threats or means necessary.

Sister Lucy Truth: The Fraud of the Centuries Uncovered

In 2017, a little known academic, Dr. Peter Chojnowski, after spending several years puzzling over the dissimilarity between photos of the early Sister Lucy and the Sister Lucy of 1967 and beyond, founded Sister Lucy Truth, an organization dedicated to a complete identification of Sister Lucy of Fatima. This project is a scientific attempt to determine whether there was a substitute who replaced a murdered or “disappeared” Sister Lucy of Fatima. After over 3 years of submitting all of the relevant photographic, video, and handwriting evidence to experts at the top of their professions, the conclusion has been a decisive one: SISTER LUCY II (1967-2005) IS AN IMPOSTER. The religious fraud of the centuries is now glaring in the face of an unknowing world. The facts point to one conclusion:

Sister Lucy of Fatima, the Seer of the Virgin, was eliminated after 1958 and another woman was put in her place to act from then on as “Sister Lucy of Fatima.” Who were the dark forces that brought this crime about? Who will investigate what happened to the real Sister Lucy? Who was this woman who was put in her place? What were the intrigues in Church and State which required that Sister Lucy dos Santos, the Sole Surviving Seer of the Apparitions of Fatima, DISAPPEAR FOREVER AND BE REPLACED BY ONE WHO WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE AGENDA OF THE HIGHEST OFFICIALS IN THE VATICAN.

This calls for a movie to break the story to a world that will soon, in the cinema, hear about the Story of Fatima again. It is, however, a story more fascinating and terrifying than anyone could ever have guessed. Contact Dr. Chojnowski here: justicepc@yahoo.com

Interviews – Dr. Chojnowski is available for interviews – Please contact here: justicepc@yahoo.com or here sisterlucytruth.org/contact/

The Impostor’s Fake Prophecy of 2008 – Video HERE

From Dr. Chojnowski – Any message from “Sister Lucy” after December 26, 1957 is fraudulent since we have scientifically and mathematically proven that the woman who appeared as “Sister Lucia of Fatima” was an imposter. We still assume that such a minor point matters! The central issues are not “family,” vaguely defined. Indeed, the family is only collapsing into meaninglessness and perversion BECAUSE Catholic doctrine was “changed” due to Vatican II and these errors were spread by the “hierarchy” that came out of that 60s era. The central battles between God and Lucifer have to do with: the very objectivity of truth, the very idea that the mind is meant to conform to the created order, the existence of sanctifying grace that raises the human soul to the supernatural level of the divine life; the validity of the sacraments of the Catholic Church, the validity of the Mass which is the chief source of grace to the world, the validity of the Orders of the Church that are the necessary conduits of sanctifying grace, the identity of the Catholic Church as the ONLY vessel of salvation for the world, the fact that it is due to the possession of sanctifying grace in our soul that we are able to avoid the fires of Hell for all eternity.

Besides the proven forgeries, Fr. Paul Kramer stated that when he met and spoke with real sister Lucia’s older sister Carolina, she said that her sister never used a typewriter or computer but always wrote in longhand. – Listen HERE

Image below shows the Impostor using a typewriter. Handwriting analysis HERE

Forensic Artist and Sculptor Carlos Bezerra collaborates with SLT on this project. – HERE

Com a colaboração do site Sister Lucy Truth divulgamos o relatório da perita forense Lois Gibson. Aumentam as evidências científicas da fraude.

The Global Reach of the Fatima Investigation and SLT is increasing. – New video from Brazil – HERE